Eval Pipelines for AI Systems
Automated evaluation that catches regressions before users do.
What we deliver
We build evaluation pipelines that score AI outputs on every change, so quality is measured continuously rather than guessed at.
We build evaluation pipelines that turn AI quality from a feeling into a measurable engineering practice. Our work starts by defining what good looks like for each AI feature, then building test sets that reflect both common usage and known edge cases. We add scoring methods that match the task, including exact match for structured output, LLM as judge for open ended responses, rubric based human review, and behavioral checks for agents. The pipeline runs automatically on every prompt change, model swap, and code update, and it blocks releases when scores drop below agreed thresholds. We also set up drift detection so changes in user behavior or model performance are caught over time. The result is an AI system where every change is measured, every regression is visible, and the team can ship with the same confidence they would for any other piece of production software.
Built for teams like yours
Who it's for
- AI product teams shipping often
- Platforms with regulated AI use
- Teams swapping between models
- Customer facing AI features
- ML and applied AI groups
Pain points we solve
- Regressions found by users
- No baseline for AI quality
- Risky model swaps
- Slow manual QA cycles
- Hard to compare prompt versions
Capabilities
Everything we cover in this engagement.
- Test set design
- Rubric and scoring definition
- LLM as judge setup
- Automated CI integration
- Drift and regression detection
- Human review workflows
- Benchmark reporting
- Release gating rules
Our process
A clear, predictable path from kickoff to outcomes.
Define
Agree on quality criteria and rubrics.
Build
Create test sets and scoring methods.
Automate
Wire evaluations into CI and release flow.
Calibrate
Tune thresholds with real production data.
Operate
Hand over reports and review cadence.
Deliverables & outcomes
What you get
- Evaluation rubrics
- Curated test sets
- Eval pipeline code
- CI integration
- Benchmark dashboard
- Review playbook
Outcomes you can expect
- Earlier regression detection
- Safer model and prompt changes
- Faster release cycles
- Clear quality baselines
- Audit ready evaluation records
What clients say
My books were 90 days behind and I was avoiding my accountant. They cleaned up nine months of mis-categorized Shopify and Stripe entries, set up proper rules in QuickBooks, and now my close lands on day four of every month. First time in three years I opened a P&L without wincing. Cash forecasting actually makes sense now.
Our SDRs were spending two hours a day copying lead data between Salesforce, Outreach, and a Google Sheet nobody owned. They mapped the whole flow, stitched it together in n8n, and added a dedupe step we did not even know we needed. Got 38 hours a week back across the team. The SDRs were the ones who pushed to expand it further.
Related case studies
12 locations on one stack, 14-day close cut to 5
Centralized bookkeeping across 12 clinics. Close cycle from 6 weeks to 6 days.
Read story Regulated FinTech operating in UK and US-EastKYC review cut from 5 days to 4 hours
AI-assisted KYC pre-screening cut onboarding from 5 days to 4 hours.
Read storyYou may also need
LLM Orchestration & Routing
Multi-model routing that matches each request to the right LLM.
We design orchestration layers that route prompts across multiple LLMs based on task type, cost, latency, and quality requirements.
ExplorePrompt Engineering & Optimization
Production prompts that hold up under real workloads.
We design, test, and refine prompts so your AI features produce accurate, consistent output across edge cases and model updates.
ExploreAI Cost Optimization
Lower AI spend without giving up on quality.
We audit your AI workloads and apply caching, model selection, and prompt changes to bring costs down while keeping output quality intact.
ExploreFrequently asked questions
Quick answers to the questions we hear most.
How big does our test set need to be?
Do you use human reviewers or LLM judges?
Can this gate our deployments?
How does this handle agents and tool use?
What if our task changes often?
Want to measure AI quality automatically?
We can build an evaluation pipeline that catches regressions before your users do.